The Veteran received emergency medical care for a severe blood clot in his right leg at a non-VA hospital due to the unavailability of VA facilities. The Board found that it was reasonable and necessary for the Veteran to seek treatment at the nearest available facility, which was the non-VA Mercy Hospital Anderson.
The deciding factor: The urgency of the emergency condition (blood clot) necessitated immediate medical attention, making it unreasonable to expect the Veteran to delay seeking care at a nearby non-VA hospital in favor of a distant VA facility.
- Claimed conditions
- Blood clot in right leg
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 11, 2016
- Citation
- 1605418
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1605418.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.