The Veteran's current conditions, including peripheral vascular disease, claudication, and numbness, are not related to his service. The Board finds that the preponderance of evidence is against the claim for service connection.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner concluded that the Veteran's PVD is not related to service and that his symptoms are more likely due to other conditions such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, tobacco use disorder, and hypercholesterolemia.
- Claimed conditions
- Peripheral Vascular Disease, Claudication, Numbness
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 17, 2016
- Citation
- 1605984
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1605984.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for peripheral vascular disease as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus type II.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for peripheral vascular disease. The issues of service connection for emphysema, COPD, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and pulmonary vascular disease (idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension) are remanded due to inadequate medical opinions.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his service-connected peripheral vascular disease were denied as the evidence did not show that he met the criteria for a higher evaluation under Diagnostic Code 7114.
- Denied
The Veteran's eligibility to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is denied because he does not require personal care services due to an inability to perform ADLs or a need for supervision, protection, or instruction. The Board found that the evidence shows the Veteran is generally independent and able to complete his ADLs without hands-on assistance.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.