The Board found that the Veteran's tension type headaches do not warrant a compensable rating, and his residual scar, head injury does not warrant a rating in excess of ten percent.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners determined that the Veteran's current symptoms are unrelated to his service-connected injuries and did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under any applicable diagnostic codes.
- Claimed conditions
- Tension type headaches, Dizziness
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 15, 2016
- Citation
- 1610359
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1610359.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for SMC based on the need for aid and attendance is remanded due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The Board finds that an examination is needed to determine if the Veteran requires aid and attendance of another person due to his service-connected disabilities alone.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for TBI, finding that there is no current disability and insufficient evidence to establish a link between in-service events and his current symptoms.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for service connection for vertigo disability to include dizziness and Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) due to conflicting medical opinions regarding whether the condition is secondary to service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for bilateral hearing loss must be remanded due to a duty to assist error. The issue of service connection for dizziness related to his hearing loss is also being remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.