The Veteran's eye disorders, including ischemic optic neuropathy, presbyopia, senile macular changes, and a temporal pinguecula of the right eye, were first manifested many years after service. The preponderance of evidence is against a finding that any are in any way related to his period of active duty for training (ACDUTRA).
The deciding factor: The Veteran's eye disorders have been diagnosed as ischemic optic neuropathy, presbyopia, senile macular changes, and a temporal pinguecula. These conditions were first manifested many years after service and are not related to his period of ACDUTRA.
- Claimed conditions
- Refractive Error, Ischemic Optic Neuropathy, Senile Macular Changes, Presbyopia, Temporal Pinguecula
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 18, 2016
- Citation
- 1611125
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1611125.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's right eye disability, including a corneal abrasion from service and current conditions like refractive error, presbyopia, mild cataracts, and blepharitis, is being remanded for further evaluation. The TDIU claim is also remanded due to its interdependence with the service connection issue.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient development and lack of a SSOC. The Veteran's vision disability, including refractive errors, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, cataracts, astigmatism, and presbyopia are being reviewed for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further examination and opinion regarding the Veteran's eye disabilities, specifically addressing whether they are related to service or caused by his facial burn scars.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for a right eye disorder due to inadequate VA medical opinions and failure to address specific evidence. The case is now pending with instructions for an addendum opinion from an appropriate clinician.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.