Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's scars were painful but not deep or caused limited motion. They met the criteria for a 10 percent rating from August 30, 2002 to October 23, 2008 and a 20 percent rating thereafter.

The deciding factor: The scars were superficial and painful on examination during this period.

Claimed conditions
Scars from residual shrapnel wounds to the right lower extremity
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
20%
Decision date
March 23, 2016
Citation
1611756

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1611756.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.