The Board has determined that additional development is necessary before the claims can be adjudicated, including obtaining a medical opinion regarding the cause of the Veteran's death and further developing the claim for Dependent's Educational Assistance benefits.
The deciding factor: The appeal requires additional development to address the cause of the Veteran's death due to in-service asbestos and lead-based paint exposure, as well as further development of the claim for Dependent's Educational Assistance benefits.
- Claimed conditions
- Pulmonary Disorder, Renal Cancer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 24, 2016
- Citation
- 1611977
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1611977.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient consideration of the Veteran's lay statements regarding his exposure to asbestos, particularly during service aboard a ship. A new examination and opinion are needed under the PACT Act for the Veteran's claimed pulmonary disorder.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a pulmonary disorder, including as due to herbicide exposure and contaminated water Camp LeJeune exposure. The evidence does not support a finding that his lung disorders are related to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the claim for service connection for a pulmonary disorder is remanded due to incomplete history, inadequate examination report, and failure to consider all relevant evidence including asbestos exposure. The Veteran's claim will be reconsidered with new opinions addressing his multiple occurrences of pneumonia during active duty.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's renal cancer is at least as likely as not related to his in-service herbicide agent exposure, specifically Agent Orange. As a result, service connection for renal cancer is granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.