The Board has determined that the Veteran's discharge for the period of service from October 2, 1981 to May 20, 1986 was under dishonorable conditions. The appeal regarding service connection for various disabilities is denied as his misconduct did not meet the criteria for a minor offense.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's discharge was due to 'Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense,' which does not qualify as a minor offense, thus preventing him from receiving VA benefits except under Chapter 17 for treatment purposes only.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 13, 2016
- Citation
- 1614991
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1614991.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.