The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining a VA examination and opinion regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's current eye disabilities.
The deciding factor: Further development is needed as the previous opinions are inadequate and do not address the relationship between the Veteran's service-connected PTSD and his diagnosed eye conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- pseudophakia, right eye, cataract, left eye, glaucoma suspect
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 21, 2016
- Citation
- 1616140
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1616140.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted a 70 percent disability rating for major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, with panic disorder and service connection for cataract, left eye. The hypertension claim was remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty to assist error and for an opinion on whether the Veteran's eye disabilities, including nuclear sclerosis and glaucoma suspect, are related to his service-connected residuals of traumatic brain injury.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eye disability, including photophobia, cataract, glaucoma suspect, retinal drusen, lattice degeneration, and vitreous syneresis, is being remanded for further review due to inconsistencies in the medical opinions provided. The examiner must address whether these conditions are related to service or secondary to his service-connected allergic rhinitis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the Veteran's eye disabilities, specifically pseudophakia, cataract, glaucoma, hypersensitive retinopathy, optic atrophy, and color blindness. The VA is required to obtain an adequate medical opinion addressing these issues.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.