Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran is seeking service connection for headaches and a sinus disorder, as well as a bilateral foot disorder and left wrist laceration residuals. The Board has remanded these matters due to the need for additional development.,The Veteran seeks service connection for a sinus disorder that he contends began in service and is related to his sleep apnea. The Board also needs further evidence regarding this claim, including private treatment records and VA examination results.,The Veteran claims service connection for bilateral foot disorders, which he asserts have been present since service. He also contends the left wrist laceration residuals are related to his in-service injury. These matters require additional development, including obtaining medical opinions on etiology and severity of these conditions.,The Veteran seeks an initial compensable rating for a service-connected left wrist laceration with scar. The Board has directed further development regarding this matter as well.

The deciding factor: These claims are being remanded due to the need for additional evidence and medical opinions to determine the nature, etiology, and severity of the Veteran's claimed conditions.,The sinus disorder claim requires obtaining private treatment records and a VA examination to address whether it is related to service-connected sleep apnea. The Board also needs to obtain an addendum opinion regarding this matter.,Bilateral foot disorders and left wrist laceration residuals require additional medical opinions on the nature, etiology, and severity of these conditions. This includes determining if they are related to service or other factors.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for his service-connected left wrist laceration requires obtaining an addendum opinion regarding whether it is aggravated by his sleep apnea.

Claimed conditions
headaches, sinus disorder, bilateral foot disorder, left wrist laceration
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 3, 2016
Citation
1617831

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1617831.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.