The Board has ordered a remand due to the need for an additional medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's pelvic disorder is related to his military service. The case will be returned to the AOJ for readjudication.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide an opinion on whether the Veteran's pelvic disorder is related to his military service, as requested in the March 2015 Board Remand.
- Claimed conditions
- pelvic disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 5, 2016
- Citation
- 1618166
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1618166.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the appeal as it cannot be in both systems simultaneously due to an existing legacy appeal for similar issues.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues for further development and examination, including service connection claims for various conditions. The Veteran's claim for refractive error is denied as it is a congenital disorder not subject to service connection. Service connection for tuberculosis exposure is also denied due to lack of current disability. Other claims are pending.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand four issues related to the Veteran's service connection claims and one issue regarding a TDIU prior to September 12, 2019. The main reasons for remanding are to obtain missing separation examination records and provide retrospective VA medical opinions on range of motion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA examinations and private treatment records obtained are not sufficient to make a determination on the Veteran's claims for service connection. Therefore, another remand is necessary to obtain additional information from the Veteran and to schedule further examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.