The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of a shrapnel wound and compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional disability as residuals of an August 1994 left hernia repair, finding that there was no evidence to support these claims.
The deciding factor: The Board found insufficient evidence to establish service connection or entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for the Veteran's claimed disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a shrapnel wound, left ilioinguinal nerve injury, left iliohypogastric nerve injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 27, 2016
- Citation
- 1621523
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1621523.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for additional development due to incomplete records and insufficient consideration of the Veteran's testimony regarding his in-service injuries.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the issues of entitlement to service connection for residuals of a shrapnel wound, left knee condition, right elbow condition, and left elbow condition due to insufficient evidence in the record.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection claims for residuals of a shrapnel wound and skin disorder are being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination.
- Denied
The Board denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) prior to May 7, 2009 and denied entitlement to special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for regular aid and attendance. The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from securing and following a substantially gainful occupation or meet the criteria for SMC due to the need for regular aid and attendance.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.