The Veteran's claim for service connection for a rectal disorder, including condyloma acuminata and fecal incontinence is being remanded due to deficiencies in the VA compensation examination opinion. The examiner must provide an opinion on whether the Veteran's condition is related to his presumed exposure to herbicides during service.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was not substantial compliance with the remand directives as the addendum opinion did not address whether the rectal disorder was caused by Agent Orange exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- rectal disorder, condyloma acuminata, fecal incontinence
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 10, 2016
- Citation
- 1623281
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1623281.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's prostate cancer residuals, fecal incontinence, and renal pelvic tumor are all granted. The prostate cancer is rated at 60 percent, the fecal incontinence as secondary to prostate cancer treatment, and the renal pelvic tumor as secondary to prostate cancer treatment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for fecal incontinence and obstructive sleep apnea due to insufficient development of evidence, including obtaining relevant private records and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's fecal incontinence is being remanded for further development as the VA examiner did not address whether it was caused or aggravated by their service-connected back disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome, female sexual arousal disorder, fecal incontinence, and gastroesophageal reflux disease due to potential Gulf War exposure. The cases are referred back to the AOJ for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.