Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has decided to remand the case for further development and readjudication under section 1725 of the statute, as partial coverage by a third party does not bar reimbursement for remaining uncovered medical expenses.

The deciding factor: Partial coverage under a health-plan contract is not a bar to eligibility for VA reimbursement of any remaining uncovered balance under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1725.

Claimed conditions
cardiovascular-renal condition
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 5, 2016
Citation
1626698

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1626698.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.