Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran is seeking service connection for various conditions including a head injury, arthritis of the back, left hip, and left knee, as well as a left leg disorder. The Board has determined that additional development is needed to clarify the nature and etiology of these claims.,The Veteran seeks service connection for arthritis in his back, left hip, and left knee. The Board finds that an examination is necessary to determine if any current arthritis is related to active service or a motor vehicle accident during service.,The Veteran contends that he has diverticulosis as a result of the October 1966 motor vehicle accident. The Board notes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether his current diverticulosis is related to service, and an examination is necessary for this determination.,The Veteran asserts that he has residuals of a hard impact to the chest and side during service which resulted in diverticulosis. The Board finds that an examination is needed to determine if any current diverticulosis is related to active service.

The deciding factor: To clarify the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claims, including determining whether his current conditions are related to service or a motor vehicle accident during service.,To determine if any current arthritis is related to active service or a motor vehicle accident during service.,To determine if the Veteran's current diverticulosis is related to service or a motor vehicle accident during service.,To determine if the Veteran's current diverticulosis is related to service.

Claimed conditions
residuals of head injury, arthritis - back, arthritis - left hip, arthritis - left knee, left leg disorder other than arthritis
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 18, 2016
Citation
1628463

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1628463.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.