The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for residuals of a right hand intrinsic Group IX muscle injury is denied as the current 10 percent rating adequately reflects his symptoms and disability level.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's symptoms do not meet or approximate the criteria for a higher rating under any applicable diagnostic code.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of shrapnel wound right hand, neurological damage
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 5, 2016
- Citation
- 1631399
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1631399.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran is granted service connection for any neurological damage caused by healthcare provided to the Veteran by VA, including due to brain abscesses and residual disabilities. The decision finds that these residuals are not a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the myringotomy performed by VA.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 benefits is denied because the radiation treatment was performed at a non-VA facility by a non-VA employee, and thus does not meet the requirements under the statute.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 is being remanded due to the need to determine if a signed consent form related to his October 2003 surgery exists and to obtain an addendum opinion from the January 2007 VA examiner regarding whether he incurred additional disabilities as a result of the surgery.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal involves multiple service-connected disabilities, including diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency. The RO has not obtained all of the Veteran's private medical records from Dr. Clemis Jackson or his Social Security Administration (SSA) disability benefits records. These records are necessary to make a full determination on the claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.