The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions and obtaining relevant VA and private treatment records.
The deciding factor: The August 2013 examination was inadequate to decide the claim due to lack of review of the claims file, failure to discuss earlier diagnoses, and failure to provide an opinion on whether the earlier diagnoses were in error or had resolved. The case is remanded for further development.
- Claimed conditions
- neurological disorder of the left upper extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 17, 2016
- Citation
- 1632663
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1632663.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that a VA examination and medical opinion for neurological disorders of the upper and lower extremities on a direct basis, to include consideration of the Veteran's presumed in-service exposure to environmental hazards during his period of service in the Persian Gulf War, should have been provided prior to the July 2019 VA rating decision on appeal.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and for reopening his claims for service connection for neurological disorders of the left upper and lower extremities. The Board found that new and material evidence had not been received to reopen these claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for neurological disorders of both upper extremities due to insufficient consideration of the Veteran's lay testimony and VA treatment records. The examiner is asked to provide an opinion on whether there is a 50% or greater probability that these conditions are related to service, including his reported symptoms during service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's PTSD and back disability have rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation since March 21, 2012. His TDIU is granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.