The Board has determined that CIDP was not incurred in or aggravated by the Veteran's military service and is not proximately due to, or aggravated by, her service-connected hysterectomy. Diabetes mellitus, type II, is also not caused or aggravated by any of her service-connected disabilities.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners found no nexus between CIDP and the Veteran's active duty service or her service-connected hysterectomy, and concluded that CIDP was less likely as not (less than 50/50 probability) caused by or a result of her service-connected hysterectomy.
- Claimed conditions
- CIDP
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 22, 2016
- Citation
- 1637281
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1637281.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for CIDP as the condition was not present during or within one year after service, and there is no evidence linking it to a service event or disease.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for CIDP and polycythemia vera due to potential exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune during military service. The VA examiner will provide an addendum opinion on whether these conditions are related to the presumed exposures.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for ataxia, previously claimed as CIDP, due to herbicide agent exposure. The Veteran's ataxia is considered related to his history of Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for CIDP, finding that the Veteran's symptoms are causally related to his exposure to Agent Orange during service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.