Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's right peroneal nerve palsy is not manifested by complete paralysis, and the current 30 percent rating for this condition remains appropriate.,Posttraumatic oculomotor dysfunction does not meet the criteria for a higher rating under applicable diagnostic codes.,Chin scars are rated based on their severity but do not warrant an increased rating as they do not cause significant functional impairment or limitation of motion.,The excision of the left serratus for a muscle flap graft affecting the non-dominant extremity does not meet the criteria for a higher rating under applicable diagnostic codes.,Degenerative disc disease with facet arthritis and spondylosis of the lumbar spine does not meet the criteria for a higher rating as it does not result in incapacitating episodes or severe ankylosis.,Since April 19, 2016, the Veteran's TBI has been manifested by level '3' impairment under the Table of Facets of Cognitive Impairment and Other Residuals of TBI Not Otherwise Classified based on motor activity. A separate compensable rating for a peripheral vestibular disorder as a residual of TBI is granted.,Posttraumatic headaches, status-post TBI do not meet the criteria for a higher rating under applicable diagnostic codes.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's conditions are rated according to their specific manifestations and current severity. No additional factors warrant an increased rating.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Right Peroneal Nerve Palsy, Posttraumatic Oculomotor Dysfunction (TBI), Scars of the Chin, Excision of Left Serratus for Muscle Flap Graft (Affecting Non-Dominant Extremity), Degenerative Disc Disease with Facet Arthritis and Spondylosis of the Lumbar Spine, Peripheral Vestibular Disorder as a Residual of TBI, Posttraumatic Headaches, Status-Post TBI
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
October 13, 2016
Citation
1640557

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1640557.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.