The Board has determined that the effective date for the grant of service connection for a psychotic disorder NOS is August 14, 2006.
The deciding factor: The claim was reopened in July 1991 and granted based on a medical opinion provided by a VA examiner dated in July 2010, which established a nexus to service.
- Claimed conditions
- Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (NOS)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 50%
- Decision date
- October 24, 2016
- Citation
- 1641369
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1641369.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's PTSD did not result in occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood from December 13, 2006, to May 17, 2012. The evidence does not reflect that the Veteran was unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected disability during this period.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request for an earlier effective date of July 17, 2009, for the grant of service connection for a psychotic disorder NOS. The decision found that no earlier effective date was warranted as the claim had been previously denied and reopened based on new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.