The Board denied reimbursement for non-VA pharmacy prescriptions because the Veteran obtained multiple refills of the medications and one fill was in excess of the 10-day limit, and there is no indication that VA pharmacies were not feasibly available.
The deciding factor: Reimbursement for non-VA pharmacy prescriptions is denied as the Veteran obtained multiple refills of the medications and one fill was in excess of the 10-day limit, and there is no indication that VA pharmacies were not feasibly available.
- Claimed conditions
- Neck pain, Opioid dependence
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 1, 2016
- Citation
- 1645123
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1645123.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for increased ratings on the lumbar spine, RLE radiculopathy of the femoral nerve, and hypertension has been dismissed. The Veteran's headaches are found to be secondary to his service-connected hypertension, and he is granted a TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's application for PCAFC enrollment was denied due to a lack of evidence and legal deficiencies in the decision. The Board has ordered remand to obtain additional medical records, correct notification issues, and provide a new medical determination based on all relevant evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for further development due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors, including unconfirmed service locations and lack of VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands all service connection issues and entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.