The Board has been notified of the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal and, therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
The deciding factor: The appellant through his authorized representative withdrew the appeal prior to the promulgation of a decision.
- Claimed conditions
- hidradenitis suppurativa with scarring
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 2, 2016
- Citation
- 1645364
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1645364.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for reimbursement of non-VA medical care provided at NYPMG Queens on September 4, 2020, to September 6, 2020, finding that the treatment was related to his service-connected hidradenitis suppurativa and rendered in a medical emergency. The appeal is granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation for hidradenitis suppurativa with scarring is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining a photograph of his face and resolving inconsistencies in medical records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The case is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling the Veteran for examinations to determine the current severity of his service-connected hidradenitis suppurativa with scarring, right knee chondromalacia, right knee laxity, and any right hip disability. The etiology of any right hip disability is also being evaluated.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.