Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board found that the Veteran's scars on her bilateral lower extremities were not painful or unstable, and thus did not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation. The RO reduced her ratings from 10% to noncompensable effective April 1, 2010.

The deciding factor: The VA examiner in July 2009 found that the scars were superficial and not painful on examination, which is consistent with the current medical evidence showing no pain or instability of the scars.

Claimed conditions
Scars
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
0%
Decision date
December 23, 2016
Citation
1647899

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1647899.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.