The Board found that the Veteran does not have current diagnoses of arthritis or frostbite residuals of the feet. The examiner determined that the Veteran has bilateral hammer toes, but did not find any evidence of arthritis or frostbite residuals.
The deciding factor: The November 2015 VA examination did not find any current diagnosis of arthritis or frostbite residuals in the Veteran's feet, and instead diagnosed him with bilateral hammer toes.
- Claimed conditions
- Arthritis of the feet, Bilateral hallux valgus, Bilateral hammer toes
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 29, 2016
- Citation
- 1648484
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1648484.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased rating and service connection are remanded due to inadequate examination reports.
- Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for arthritis of the arms, feet, and legs; hearing loss; thoracolumbar spine disability; sleep apnea; and PTSD. However, a 10 percent rating was granted for prostatitis with BPH prior to September 19, 2020.
- Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for degenerative changes in the neck and right upper extremity radiculopathy, but granted a 30 percent disability rating for bilateral pes cavus from August 2, 2012 to June 7, 2024.
- Partly granted
The Board granted eligibility for attorney fees based on past-due benefits awarded in a February 2024 rating decision, as it pertains to awards of higher ratings for the Veteran's service-connected degenerative arthritis of the cervical spine and bilateral hallux valgus. The appeal was denied with respect to service connection for bilateral lower sciatic radiculopathy.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.