Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Board is remanding the case for further clarification regarding the Veteran's service connection claim, specifically addressing his exposure to ionizing radiation and its relation to myasthenia gravis. The case will be adjudicated again after receiving an opinion from the Under Secretary of Benefits.

The deciding factor: Clarification is needed on the use of different units (rem, Gray, rad) for dose estimation and their significance in determining the Veteran's service connection claim.

Claimed conditions
myasthenia gravis
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
Ionizing radiation
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 2, 2017
Citation
1703165

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1703165.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.