The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for acne vulgaris was granted, with a 30 percent disability rating effective May 8, 1998. The claim for an earlier effective date for the award of service connection for acne vulgaris was also granted.
The deciding factor: The VA examinations and medical records supported the Veteran's claim that his acne vulgaris warranted a higher rating based on its severity, but did not meet the criteria for a 60 percent evaluation. The effective date was granted as May 8, 1998, which is when service connection was first established.
- Claimed conditions
- Acne Vulgaris
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- March 7, 2017
- Citation
- 1706953
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1706953.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for acne vulgaris was denied as his condition did not meet the criteria for deep acne (deep inflamed nodules and pus-filled cysts) affecting less than 40 percent of the face and neck, or deep acne other than on the face and neck.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeals for higher ratings and earlier effective dates have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of service connection for hearing loss or disability of the cervical spine, and denied all other claims.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for Vitamin D Deficiency and Chronic Cough Condition were dismissed due to withdrawal of the appeals.,The Veteran's appeal for Acne Vulgaris was dismissed as his claim was granted during the appeal period.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to outstanding VA treatment records and a need for another examination to assess the Veteran's acne vulgaris with sebaceous cysts. The TDIU claim is also being remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.