The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to inadequate VA examinations and missing treatment records.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners did not consider all relevant evidence, including the Veteran's reports of symptom onset and other pertinent medical records.
- Claimed conditions
- esophageal, stomach
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 23, 2017
- Citation
- 1709094
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1709094.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and other conditions, rendered him unable to secure and follow substantially gainful employment prior to July 21, 2025.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for a gastrointestinal disability is being remanded due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The AOJ must obtain and consider private medical records from the Cleveland Clinic related to his gastrointestinal disorder before re-adjudicating his claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to concerns about the competency of a VA examiner who provided opinions on the relationship between the Veteran's lower jaw disability and his stomach and colon disabilities. The Veteran is requesting additional information regarding this examiner's qualifications.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining an addendum opinion from a VA medical professional regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed esophageal cancer.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.