The Board finds that the prescribed Artane did not cause the Veteran's oral lesions, dental caries, and tooth loss. The proximate cause of these issues was likely due to other medications with dry mouth side effects and advancing age.
The deciding factor: The VA medical examiner stated that it was less likely than not that the Veteran's oral lesions, dental caries, and tooth loss were caused by Artane because four months' use would not produce such issues. However, he also noted that the issues may have been worsened due to dry mouth side effects of other medications or advancing age.
- Claimed conditions
- oral lesions, dental caries, tooth loss
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 17, 2017
- Citation
- 1712362
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1712362.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for dental trauma to lower rear molars left and right side of mouth for compensation purposes, finding no evidence of a compensable disability due to loss of substance of body of maxilla or mandible.
- Partly granted
The Board granted the Veteran's applications to reopen claims for service connection for mononucleosis, pulmonary emphysema, and severe tooth loss. The claim for TDIU was denied as moot due to a combined 100% rating.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for tooth loss, carpal tunnel syndrome of the right and left upper extremities, and a right middle finger disability as there was no evidence showing that these conditions were incurred in or caused by service.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for a respiratory disability but dismissed appeals for service connection and increased ratings for various other conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.