Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that additional development is needed to obtain the appellant's SSA records, military dependent treatment records, and medical opinions. The case will be remanded for these actions.

The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed to support the appellant's claims and to determine if she was exposed to mustard gas during her ACDUTRA in July 2002.

Claimed conditions
abdominal disorder, manifested by left lower quadrant pain, pharyngitis, claimed as gag reflex, chronic sore throat, and difficulty swallowing, cerebrovascular disease, also claimed as compression-like traumatic brain injury (TBI) and as a Chiari I malformation, psychiatric disorder, to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression with mood swings, endometriosis, chronic disorder of the feet, claimed as manifested by swelling, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with dysphasia, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), also claimed as colon problems, gastroenteritis, and chronic constipation, hysterectomy, acne, liver cysts, migraine headaches with photosensitivity, neurocognitive disorder with short-term memory loss, neurogenic bladder with incontinence, chronic urinary tract infections (UTIs), periodontal disease, for compensation purposes, phleboliths of the pelvis with pain, sleep apnea, chronic skin disorder, manifested by dry skin, cyst of the breast, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) syndrome, uterine fibroids with dysmenorrhea, vaginitis, allergies to latex, metal, certain food, and numerous drugs, asthma, sinusitis, chronic bronchitis, also claimed as dyspnea and upper respiratory infections (URIs), allergic rhinitis
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 21, 2017
Citation
1713045

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1713045.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.