The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions on the relationship between his cold injury residuals and osteoarthritis of hands and feet, as well as peripheral neuropathy of hands and feet.
The deciding factor: The Board needs to obtain a new VA medical opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's cold injury residuals and his diagnosed conditions in order to make an informed decision on these claims.
- Claimed conditions
- cold injury residuals, osteoarthritis of hands and feet, peripheral neuropathy of hands and feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 2, 2017
- Citation
- 1714374
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1714374.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral upper and lower extremity neuropathy and cold injury residuals, finding that the Veteran's current conditions are due to frostbite and cold injuries during his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded all issues to correct errors in assisting the veteran, including obtaining missing records.
- Granted
The Veteran's request to reopen claims for back pain and cold injury residuals of the extremities is granted. The issue of service connection for cold injury residuals of the extremities is remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's hypertension began in service or is otherwise related to service, including elevated blood pressure readings in May 1975. The other claims of service connection are denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.