Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Veteran's sinus condition was not caused or aggravated by active military service.,New and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim for low back pain with sciatica, but it is not etiologically related to service.,CTS of the left upper extremity was not caused or aggravated by active military service or a service-connected disability.,Evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim for diabetes mellitus; however, the Veteran's COPD is not etiologically related to service.,New and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim for hypertension. The evidence does not show that this condition was caused or aggravated by service-connected PTSD.,Fibromyalgia was not caused or aggravated by active military service.,The Veteran's application to reopen his previously denied claim for ureaplasma urealyticum (to include infertility, low sperm count, and low testosterone) has not been supported by new and material evidence.

The deciding factor: The sinus condition was not caused or aggravated by active military service.,New and material evidence submitted does not establish a relationship between the Veteran's back pain with sciatica and his active duty service.,CTS of the left upper extremity is not related to service or a service-connected disability.,Evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim for diabetes mellitus, but COPD was not caused by service.,New and material evidence submitted does not establish that hypertension is related to PTSD.,Fibromyalgia was not caused or aggravated by active military service.,The application to reopen the ureaplasma urealyticum claim has not been supported by new and material evidence.

Claimed conditions
sinus condition, low back pain with sciatica, CTS of the left upper extremity, diabetes mellitus, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), hypertension, fibromyalgia
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 16, 2017
Citation
1716468

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1716468.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.