The Veteran's lung disorder, to include asbestosis, was not incurred in service and is denied.,The residuals of right-sided brain damage were not incurred in service and are denied.,An effective date earlier than May 23, 2003, for the grant of service connection for vertigo has been denied.
The deciding factor: Service treatment records do not document any lung disorder or related complaints. Post-service private treatment records show no significant airflow obstruction and a history of mild asbestosis. The March 2012 VA opinion concluded that the Veteran's biapical pleural calcifications, left upper lung scarring, and focal pleural fibrosis were less likely than not incurred during active service or caused by exposure to asbestos during active service.,Service treatment records do not document any right-sided brain damage. Post-service private treatment records show a history of diffuse ischemic changes with periventricular white matter demyelination and an old left basal ganglia infarct, without acute brain abnormalities. The March 2012 VA opinion concluded that the Veteran's disorder was most likely caused by or related to his longstanding hyperlipidemia, hypertension, history of tobacco use, and the natural effects of age.,The appellant claimed problems with balance and equilibrium in a May 2003 NOD as part of the brain injury claim. The effective date for service connection for vertigo was granted on May 23, 2003.
- Claimed conditions
- Lung Disorder, to include asbestosis, Right-sided brain damage
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 25, 2017
- Citation
- 1718585
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1718585.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.