The Veteran's claim for service connection for a shin disorder is being remanded due to the need for an addendum opinion addressing whether his shin disorder is related to his military service, including extended periods of running, walking, and marching with equipment on his back.
The deciding factor: The examiner was unable to provide a clear rationale for their initial opinion without considering recent evidence submitted by the Veteran regarding his in-service duties and the onset/continuity of his shin pain.
- Claimed conditions
- shin disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 2, 2017
- Citation
- 1719660
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1719660.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to a lack of an opinion regarding whether the Veteran's shin disorder is related to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and development of his claims for service connection for lumbar spine, bilateral heel, and shin disorders.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a shin disorder, claimed as shin splints, is being remanded due to the need for additional development and examination.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.