Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development and examination.,The Veteran is seeking service connection for his refractive error, blepharitis, bilateral cataracts, tinea, and chronic lumbosacral strain. The Board finds that further development is necessary before a decision can be made on these claims.,Service connection for mild venous valvular insufficiency is also at issue. The Veteran seeks service connection based on his diabetes mellitus, type II.,The Veteran's claim for tinea is related to his military service and the Board finds that further examination is necessary to determine if it was aggravated by his diabetes mellitus, type II.,Service connection for chronic lumbosacral strain with herniated nucleus pulposus is also at issue. The Veteran seeks service connection based on his military service.

The deciding factor: The claims are being remanded due to the need for additional development and examination of the Veteran's medical records, including STRs.,The Veteran has multiple conditions that he believes are related to his military service, specifically diabetes mellitus, type II. The Board finds that further examination is necessary to determine if these conditions are secondary to or aggravated by his diabetes mellitus, type II.,Service connection for mild venous valvular insufficiency is also at issue and the Veteran seeks service connection based on his military service. The Board finds that further examination is necessary to determine if this condition was caused by or aggravated by his diabetes mellitus, type II.,The Veteran's claim for tinea is related to his military service but he believes it may have been aggravated by his diabetes mellitus, type II. The Board finds that further examination is necessary to determine the etiology of his skin condition.,Service connection for chronic lumbosacral strain with herniated nucleus pulposus is also at issue and the Veteran seeks service connection based on his military service. The Board finds that further examination is necessary to determine if this condition was caused by or aggravated by his diabetes mellitus, type II.

Claimed conditions
arterial hypertension, refractive error, blepharitis, bilateral cataracts, mild venous valvular insufficiency, tinea, chronic lumbosacral strain
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 26, 2017
Citation
1724139

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1724139.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.