The Veteran is granted service connection for residuals of a shrapnel wound in the back and recurrent urinary tract infection. Service connection is denied for eczema (claimed as jungle rot).,Service connection has been established for the Veteran's shrapnel wound and recurring UTI, but not for his claimed skin disability.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that there was no evidence in the claims file to support recurrent urinary tract infections.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of shrapnel wound in the back, recurrent urinary tract infection, eczema (claimed as jungle rot)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 12, 2017
- Citation
- 1726895
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1726895.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's cause of death was not related to service-connected conditions, and the criteria for DIC benefits were not met. The Board denied both claims.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was not caused by his military service, including exposure to herbicide agents. The cause of death is attributed to rectal cancer with lung metastasis and associated complications.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted an earlier effective date of May 4, 2016 for a 30% evaluation for service-connected uterine fibroids. The issues of a rating in excess of 40 percent for recurrent UTI and TDIU are remanded due to the need for additional development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the Veteran's genitourinary disorders, including hypospadias. The examiner is requested to provide an opinion on whether the Veteran's congenital defect was subject to or aggravated by a superimposed disease or injury during service and to identify any other identified disabilities related to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.