The Veteran's claim for service connection for a cerebrovascular accident (stroke) is being remanded due to conflicting medical opinions and the need for further clarification of his condition.
The deciding factor: There are conflicting medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran suffered from a cerebrovascular accident during service, with some records suggesting he did and others not. The VA examiner's opinion needs to be reconciled with these records.
- Claimed conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident (Stroke), Cerebral arteriosclerosis, Microvascular disease of the brain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 18, 2017
- Citation
- 1728007
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1728007.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that there were errors in the decision-making process and additional evidence is needed to properly assess the Veteran's cause of death. The remand includes obtaining private medical records, specifically those related to cardiovascular conditions and sleep apnea, as well as SSA disability benefit records.
- Granted
The Veteran is eligible for special monthly compensation (SMC) under the statutory housebound criteria from September 20, 2010 due to his service-connected coronary artery disease and other disabilities independently rated at 60 percent or more.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a cerebrovascular accident and seizure disorder due to exposure at Camp Lejeune. An addendum opinion is needed from the VA examiner to address whether these conditions are related to service, considering evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim of service connection for residuals of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA), including as secondary to diabetes mellitus and/or coronary artery disease, and whether it is related to herbicide exposure. The decision will be reconsidered due to inadequate medical opinions on aggravation and direct service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.