The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for idiopathic angioedema was granted with an effective date of February 9, 2006.
The deciding factor: The Veteran submitted an informal claim for an increased rating on February 9, 2006, and the Board found that this implicitly included a belief in entitlement to a specific benefit consistent with 38 C.F.R. § 3.1(p).
- Claimed conditions
- idiopathic angioedema
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- July 20, 2017
- Citation
- 1728330
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1728330.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied a compensable rating for idiopathic angioedema from April 5, 2021, as the Veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for erectile dysfunction and idiopathic angioedema, but denied service connection for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The case is remanded to provide a VA examination regarding the nature of the Veteran's claimed idiopathic angioedema.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected idiopathic angioedema was granted an initial rating of 20 percent effective June 16, 2008. The rating has been increased to 40 percent as of March 1, 2012.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.