Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board found that the Veteran's statements regarding a plane being shot down and injuring his knee are not credible, as they contradict earlier medical records. The diagnosis of PTSD based on these inaccurate premises lacks probative value.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's lay testimony was based on an inaccurate factual premise (injury during a bail out over Japan), which rendered the diagnosis of PTSD unreliable.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 26, 2017
Citation
1729319

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1729319.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.