The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to a request for a videoconference Board hearing. The earlier effective date issue remains pending and will be reviewed with consideration of all applicable laws and regulations.
The deciding factor: The Veteran requested a videoconference Board hearing, which must be scheduled as per the procedural requirements set forth by VA.
- Claimed conditions
- adhesions, multiple surgeries
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 1, 2017
- Citation
- 1730485
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1730485.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for adhesions as secondary to irritable bowel syndrome, finding that there was no nexus between the claimed condition and service or a service-connected disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for revision of rating decisions and effective date determinations are being remanded due to the need for further review and consideration.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher evaluation for bilateral ovarian cysts, ovarian cyst removal, adhesions, and endometriosis is denied as the evidence does not show bowel or bladder involvement.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating for her residuals of cesarean section, urinary frequency and urinary stress incontinence, or painful scar. Her claim for service connection for female sexual arousal disorder was granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.