The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess the severity of his left leg disability and determine if there is shortening of the left lower extremity.
The deciding factor: The previous examinations did not comply with the requirements set forth in Correia v. McDonald (2016) regarding range of motion testing on both active and passive motion, in weight-bearing and non-weight bearing, and with the opposing joint.
- Claimed conditions
- Left leg fracture
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 4, 2017
- Citation
- 1731456
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1731456.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's need for aid and attendance or housebound status was not established due to his service-connected disabilities, as the majority of his physical limitations were caused by nonservice-connected conditions. The Board found that SMC is not warranted based on either the need for regular aid and attendance or being housebound.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for treatment provided by the Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center in May 2007 was denied due to lack of additional disability caused by VA care, and his right knee injury claim is pending.
- Denied
The Board found no evidence to support a service connection claim for the low back disorder, concluding that it is not related to service or a service-connected disability.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran did not sustain a left leg fracture during service, and his current lumbar spine disorder and acquired psychiatric disorder were not incurred in or aggravated by service. The claim for organic heart disease was denied as well.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.