The Board has remanded the case for further development to determine if the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents while stationed at Fort McClellan and to offer an opinion regarding the etiology of her T-cell lymphoma.
The deciding factor: Further development is needed to verify exposure to herbicides and to provide a medical opinion on the etiology of the Veteran's T-cell lymphoma.
- Claimed conditions
- T-cell lymphoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 10, 2017
- Citation
- 1732518
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1732518.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for T-cell lymphoma was granted on a presumptive basis pursuant to the PACT Act, effective August 10, 2022. The earlier effective date is denied.,SMC based on housebound status was granted effective August 10, 2022, and an earlier effective date is not warranted.
- Denied
The Board denied the motion to revise or reverse a previous rating decision, finding that it was not clear and unmistakable error (CUE) for the April 2002 decision not to grant service connection for T-cell lymphoma from September 1996. The Veteran's earlier claim of peripheral neuropathy did not reasonably encompass T-cell lymphoma.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the February 2024 decision by the AOJ was legally inadequate due to a pre-decisional duty-to-assist error. The case is being remanded for further review and consideration of all relevant evidence, including medical opinions from the CEAT.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, as there was no evidence that the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents during his service or that his T-cell lymphoma, DM, and hypertension were caused by any incident of service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.