The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including additional VA examinations and consideration of the April 2017 memorandum from the Director of Compensation Service regarding extra-schedular evaluation. The TDIU issue will also be considered on remand.
The deciding factor: The case must be remanded to comply with the September 2014 Board remand directives, including adjudicating the issues on appeal and considering the April 2017 memorandum from the Director of Compensation Service regarding extra-schedular evaluation for the left shoulder disability. The TDIU issue will also be considered.
- Claimed conditions
- left shoulder separation with traumatic arthritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 18, 2017
- Citation
- 1734075
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1734075.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected left shoulder disability has been rated at 30 percent since the April 2009 rating decision. The Board found that his current range of motion did not meet the criteria for an increased rating, as he had restricted range of motion to 25 degrees from the side.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran is seeking an increased rating for his left shoulder separation with traumatic arthritis, currently rated at 30 percent. The Board has ordered a remand to obtain additional medical records and conduct further examination.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.