The Veteran's right foot disability, including a healed fracture of the fifth metatarsal and hammertoes and neuroma, has been manifested by reports of pain and difficulty with weight-bearing. The Board finds that a 10 percent rating is warranted for moderate residuals of the right foot injury.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's testimony established that his right foot disability causes him significant functional impairment in walking and bearing weight, which aligns with the criteria for a moderate right foot disability under DC 5284.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Fifth Metatarsal Fracture, Hammertoes, Neuroma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- September 7, 2017
- Citation
- 1737499
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1737499.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's bilateral foot disability, which includes acquired pes cavus with degenerative arthritis, hallux valgus, and hammertoes, has been rated at the maximum schedular rating of 50 percent. The evidence does not show actual loss of use of the feet.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient service treatment records and a need for further examination by a podiatrist. The Veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral foot disability, including plantar warts, is being reviewed on the merits.
- Denied
The Veteran's SMC claim for aid and attendance or housebound status was denied as his service-connected conditions do not meet the criteria for such benefits.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral foot disability, including pes planus and related conditions. Additional development is needed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.