Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision 1738643

The deciding factor: The Veteran's service in Thailand during the Vietnam Era and was stationed at an Air Force base known to have been exposed to herbicides. The remaining element is whether he served on or near the perimeter of Korat RTAFB. The Board finds that the evidence of record is in equipoise as to whether this element has been established.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Gulf War
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 13, 2017
Citation
1738643

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1738643.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.