The Board has determined that additional development is necessary to properly adjudicate the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death. This includes obtaining updated VCAA notice, medical records from various hospitals and providers, verification of service, and any other relevant information.
The deciding factor: Additional development is required as per prior Board remand instructions to ensure proper process and assistance in developing the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- Drug Overdose
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 21, 2017
- Citation
- 1741472
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1741472.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's spouse died due to a drug overdose, but there was no service-connected disability at the time of death. The claim for service connection for cause of death is denied.
- Granted
The Veteran's death was caused by a drug overdose due to severe degenerative arthritis with neck and back pain, which was proximately caused by VA's incorrect Methadone prescription. The Board found that the cause of death was not willful misconduct and granted DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Denied
The VA treatment in September 2004, including the prescribed medications, did not cause the Veteran's death due to drug overdose and alcoholism. The Board finds that there is no evidence supporting a claim for VA disability compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for the cause of her husband's death and for DEA benefits under Chapter 35. The VA psychologist concluded that the veteran's death was not related to her active service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.