The Veteran's claim for service connection for meralgia paresthetica of the right lower extremity has been denied.,There is no evidence prior to September 24, 2011 that can be construed as a formal or informal claim for an effective date earlier than this date for meralgia paresthetica of the left lower extremity.,The Veteran's current rating for meralgia paresthetica of the left lower extremity is not compensable.,The Veteran's service-connected depression does not warrant a rating in excess of 30 percent.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence showing that the Veteran had meralgia paresthetica of the right lower extremity during service or at any time since service. The current diagnosis for this condition was not established until after September 24, 2011.,No communication prior to September 24, 2011 can be construed as a formal or informal claim for an effective date earlier than this date for meralgia paresthetica of the left lower extremity. The Veteran's current condition is not related to service.,The current rating assigned for meralgia paresthetica of the left lower extremity does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating based on the severity of symptoms and functional impairment.,The Veteran's service-connected depression has been rated as 30 percent disabling, which is already at its maximum schedular rating. No higher rating can be assigned under any other diagnostic code.
- Claimed conditions
- meralgia paresthetica of the right lower extremity, meralgia paresthetica of the left lower extremity
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 28, 2017
- Citation
- 1743246
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1743246.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the Veteran's claims for a higher disability rating and TDIU due to inadequate examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for meralgia paresthetica of his right and left lower extremities due to inadequate VA medical examinations. The Veteran is also being asked to complete a TDIU application form.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to unclear muscle group injuries and nerve involvement. The effective date of an earlier rating remains denied as per law.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA spine examination and consideration of his TDIU claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.