The Board finds that the Veteran's septal deviation does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under any applicable diagnostic code, as his nasal obstruction is less than 50% on both sides. The claim is therefore denied.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's nasal obstruction did not reach the level required by any applicable diagnostic codes to warrant a compensable rating.
- Claimed conditions
- septal deviation, dry mouth, snoring
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 29, 2017
- Citation
- 1743760
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1743760.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for loss of salivary gland, dry mouth, and loss of swallowing due to inadequate VA examinations at the Facility where he is incarcerated.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for compensable ratings for calculus excision in the right submandibular gland, with dry mouth and loss of teeth, residuals of calculus excision in the right submandibular gland, and neck scar, residual of surgical excision of right submandibular gland, prior to December 6, 2022 and in excess of 10 percent thereafter have been denied.,The Board found that a compensable rating is not warranted for any of the conditions due to lack of evidence showing interference with endocrine functions or residual endocrine dysfunction.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for snoring was dismissed because the VA Form 10182, Notice of Disagreement, was not filed within the required time frame.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection and initial compensable ratings for various conditions, as well as dismissed a claim for service connection for septal deviation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.