Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's PTSD resulted in occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks, warranting a 30 percent rating.,Prior to April 20, 2010, the Veteran's CAD was manifested by an ability to perform a workload of more than 7 to 10 METs with dyspnea, fatigue, and angina, warranting a 30 percent rating. Since April 20, 2010, but no earlier, his CAD has been manifested by an ability to perform a workload of more than 3 METs (metabolic equivalent) but not greater than 5 METs with dyspnea, fatigue, and angina; warranting a 60 percent rating.,Since January 27, 2008, but no earlier, the Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation, warranting a TDIU.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's PTSD symptoms did not result in occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity at any point during the appeal period. The current rating of 30 percent adequately reflects his disability.,Prior to April 20, 2010, the Veteran's CAD was manifested by an ability to perform a workload of more than 7 to 10 METs with dyspnea, fatigue, and angina, warranting a 30 percent rating. Since April 20, 2010, but no earlier, his CAD has been manifested by an ability to perform a workload of more than 3 METs (metabolic equivalent) but not greater than 5 METs with dyspnea, fatigue, and angina; warranting a 60 percent rating.,The Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation since January 27, 2008, but no earlier.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
30%
Decision date
October 16, 2017
Citation
1745785

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1745785.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.