The Board has ordered a remand to clarify the nature of the Veteran's current heel disabilities and determine if they are related to his active duty service. The case will be returned for further development.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner needs to provide a comprehensive opinion regarding whether the Veteran's current heel conditions are at least as likely as not caused by his in-service injury, considering all relevant evidence including lay statements and private examination findings.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral heel contusions, left insertional Achilles tendinopathy, right and left foot and ankle arthritic changes
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 26, 2017
- Citation
- 1748118
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1748118.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board finds that the Veteran does not have a current disability of either his left arm or bilateral heels, and thus service connection for these conditions is denied.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for lumbosacral strain with L1 wedging and bilateral heel contusions, but denied service connection for stress fracture of the dorsum of the right foot. The veteran's bilateral heel contusions are currently rated as noncompensably disabling.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.