The Veteran's appeal for increased evaluations for his bilateral knee disabilities was denied. The Board found that the VA examinations did not adequately address the Veteran's complaints of flare-ups and any subsequent functional impairment during flare-ups.
The deciding factor: The examination findings were not substantially compliant with the Board's December 2016 remand orders, as they failed to address the criteria outlined by the Court in Correia v. McDonald (2016).
- Claimed conditions
- musculoligamentous strain of the right knee, musculoligamentous strain of the left knee
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 27, 2017
- Citation
- 1748561
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1748561.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's deviated septum is granted as service-connected. The issues of chronic cough, paresthesias of the right big toe, musculoligamentous strain of the left knee, multiple fractures of the left hand, multiple fractures of the right hand, and GERD are remanded for further examination and rating considerations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand several issues related to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including knee and spine conditions. The reasons are that new evidence indicates an increase in severity for all conditions, a peripheral nerve examination is needed, and VA examinations must include joint testing for pain on both active and passive motion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess the current severity of his bilateral knee disabilities and obtain any outstanding VA treatment records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to changes in the severity of the Veteran's service-connected left knee disability and a need to consider findings regarding his service-connected left hip.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.