The Veteran seeks service connection for a heart disability, which was diagnosed several years after his active military service. The VA examiner opined that the condition is less likely related to in-service events or conditions, but may be linked to Agent Orange exposure during service. Additional development is needed to verify the Veteran's claimed herbicide exposure.
The deciding factor: The heart disability is presumed due to Agent Orange exposure during service, but not directly related to in-service events or conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- heart disability, to include arteriosclerosis
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 7, 2017
- Citation
- 1750640
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1750640.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.